Site Update in Progress: We are currently revamping our site to enhance your experience. Some features may be temporarily unavailable. Stay tuned! Exciting new content is coming soon. Thank you for your patience!
For accurate and efficient selection of the device
Improve and facilitate flow diverter sizing in clinical routine
How FDsize Works
Check out an example of a computational modeling done by FDsize module.
An example of a computational modeling done by FDsize module.
Proven Clinical Impact
FDsize is safe, fast and accurate
Clinical study conducted on
0
Patients *
0x Safer
Extra handeling divided by 2
0% Faster
Shorter intervention time
0% Lower
X-Ray exposure
0%
shorter flow diverter - Better length accuracy **
Why FDsize?
FDsize module of Sim&Size™ is an amazing module that helps the user with optimal selection of flow diverter sizing.
Safe
Reduces the risk of extra handling
Reduces the X-ray exposure for both patient and physician
Reproducible
Regardless of clinical experience, different treatment strategies can be modeled with stable accuracy and reproducibility.
Efficient
Less devices per treatment & time of surgery
Helps to select shorter devices: easier navigability, less metal in the patient and less length-related complications such as twisting.
Selection
Faster and safer election of device. Apposition, Size & Porosity
Sizing
Avoid under and over sizing and its resultant consequences
FDsize goes further
Improving wall apposition of the device , which is linked to a good healing process
Improving the accuracy of the proximal landing zone
Commutating of the level of implant compression
Understanding the surface metal coverage along the implant
Steps Involved
6 Steps to FDsize computatinal modeling
Follow the 6 steps to achieve your clinical therapeutic strategy
* Methods: MONOCENTRIC RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY 189 patients, 95 (50.2%) without and 94 (49.7%) with software assistance were analyzed. Consecutive patients who underwent aneurysm embolization with Pipeline were retrospectively enrolled (January 2015-December 2017) and divided into two groups: treated with and without simulation. Through univariate and multivariate models, we evaluated: (1) rate of corrective intervention for non-optimal stent placement,(2) duration of intervention,(3) radiation dose, and (4) stent length.
** Objective: To demonstrate technical and clinical impacts of the Sim&Size simulation during treatment with the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device.