🚧 Site Update in Progress: We are currently revamping our site to enhance your experience. Some features may be temporarily unavailable. Stay tuned! Exciting new content is coming soon. Thank you for your patience!

For  accurate and efficient selection of the device

Improve and facilitate flow diverter sizing in clinical routine

 

How FDsize Works

Check out an example of a computational modeling done by FDsize module.

An example of a computational modeling done by FDsize module.

Proven Clinical Impact

FDsize is safe, fast and accurate

Clinical study conducted on

0
Patients *
0 x Safer
Extra handeling divided by 2
0 % Faster
Shorter intervention time
0 % Lower
X-Ray exposure
0 %
shorter flow diverter - Better length accuracy **

Why FDsize?

FDsize module of Sim&Size is an amazing module that helps the user with optimal selection of flow diverter sizing.

Safe

Reduces the risk of extra handling Reduces the X-ray exposure for both patient and physician

Reproducible

Regardless of clinical experience, different treatment strategies can be modeled with stable accuracy and reproducibility.

Efficient

Less devices per treatment & time of surgery Helps to select shorter devices: easier navigability, less metal in the patient and less length-related complications such as twisting.

Selection

Faster and safer election of device. Apposition, Size & Porosity

Sizing

Avoid under and over sizing and its resultant consequences

FDsize goes further

 Improving wall apposition of the device , which is linked to a good healing process

  Improving the accuracy of the proximal landing zone

  Commutating of the level of implant compression

  Understanding the surface metal coverage along the implant

Steps Involved

6 Steps to FDsize computatinal modeling

Follow the 6 steps to achieve your clinical therapeutic strategy

References:

 Virtual simulation with Sim&Size software for Pipeline Flex Embolization:evaluation of the technical and clinicalimpact.Piergallini L,et al. J Neuroln tervent Surg 2020;0:1-6. doi:10.1136fneurintsurg-2020-015813

* Methods: MONOCENTRIC RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY 189 patients, 95 (50.2%) without and 94 (49.7%) with software assistance were analyzed. Consecutive patients who underwent aneurysm embolization with Pipeline were retrospectively enrolled (January 2015-December 2017) and divided into two groups: treated with and without simulation. Through univariate and multivariate models, we evaluated: (1) rate of corrective intervention for non-optimal stent placement,(2) duration of intervention,(3) radiation dose, and (4) stent length.

** Objective: To demonstrate technical and clinical impacts of the Sim&Size simulation during treatment with the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device.

Try out FDsize modeling online!

Explore our other modules